GLM-5.2 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
GLM-5.2 (Zhipu) versus GLM-5.3-Flash (Zhipu): API pricing, context window, capabilities and uptime, from the same data as each model page, at the WandAPI default channel price. Input costs 4.8 Credits / M for GLM-5.2 and 0.48 Credits / M for GLM-5.3-Flash, so GLM-5.3-Flash is 90% cheaper. Context windows are 1M and 1M.
Specs side by side
| Item | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input (prompt) · Credits / M | 4.8≈ $0.73 | 0.48≈ $0.073 |
| Output (completion) · Credits / M | 16.8≈ $2.55 | 1.68≈ $0.255 |
| Cache read · Credits / M | 1.2 | 0.138 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 128K |
| 7-day uptime | — | 94.2% |
| Latest probe latency | — | 1.2s |
| Measured throughput | 11.9 t/s | 45.8 t/s |
| Protocols | Anthropic Messages | Anthropic Messages / OpenAI Responses |
| Sample monthly cost (10M in + 2M out) | 81.6≈ $12.40 | 8.16≈ $1.24 |
Prices are the WandAPI default channel price in Credits (1 Credit = ¥1); green marks the better side. Uptime and latency come from WandAPI probes; a dash means the model is not probed yet.
Capabilities
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM-5.2 or GLM-5.3-Flash?
At the WandAPI default channel price, GLM-5.2 input costs 4.8 Credits / M and GLM-5.3-Flash input costs 0.48 Credits / M, so GLM-5.3-Flash is 90% cheaper. Output and cache prices are in the specs table above.
Which has the larger context window, GLM-5.2 or GLM-5.3-Flash?
GLM-5.2 offers 1M tokens, GLM-5.3-Flash offers 1M tokens.
Can I switch between GLM-5.2 and GLM-5.3-Flash at any time?
Yes. WandAPI calls every model with the same API key; switching is just changing the model field in the request, and billing is split per model in one console.
How do the capabilities of GLM-5.2 and GLM-5.3-Flash differ?
Only GLM-5.3-Flash: Vision, Video, File Input. Every other capability is either supported by both or by neither; see the capability table above.
More comparisons
One API key for both GLM-5.2 and GLM-5.3-Flash
Free credits on sign-up, pay as you go, no monthly fee.