GLM-5.2 vs GLM-5.3

GLM-5.2 (Zhipu) versus GLM-5.3 (Zhipu): API pricing, context window, capabilities and uptime, from the same data as each model page, at the WandAPI default channel price. Input costs 4.8 Credits / M for GLM-5.2 and 4.8 Credits / M for GLM-5.3. Context windows are 1M and 1M.

Input (prompt)
4.8Credits / M
≈ $0.73
Output (completion)
16.8Credits / M
≈ $2.55
1M context · 128K output40% off
GLM-5.2 details
Input (prompt)
4.8Credits / M
≈ $0.73
Output (completion)
16.8Credits / M
≈ $2.55
1M context · 128K output40% off
GLM-5.3 details

Specs side by side

Item
GLM-5.2glm-5.2
GLM-5.3glm-5.3
Input (prompt) · Credits / M4.8≈ $0.734.8≈ $0.73
Output (completion) · Credits / M16.8≈ $2.5516.8≈ $2.55
Cache read · Credits / M1.21.2
Context window1M1M
Max output128K128K
7-day uptime——
Latest probe latency——
Measured throughput11.9 t/s7.2 t/s
ProtocolsAnthropic MessagesAnthropic Messages / OpenAI Responses
Sample monthly cost (10M in + 2M out)81.6≈ $12.4081.6≈ $12.40

Prices are the WandAPI default channel price in Credits (1 Credit = ¥1); green marks the better side. Uptime and latency come from WandAPI probes; a dash means the model is not probed yet.

Capabilities

CapabilityGLM-5.2GLM-5.3
Function Calling
Reasoning
Prompt Caching
Response Schema
Streaming
Vision
Audio
Video
File Input
Web Search
Realtime
Session
Media
Multipart Form
Binary Response

FAQ

Which has the larger context window, GLM-5.2 or GLM-5.3?

GLM-5.2 offers 1M tokens, GLM-5.3 offers 1M tokens.

Can I switch between GLM-5.2 and GLM-5.3 at any time?

Yes. WandAPI calls every model with the same API key; switching is just changing the model field in the request, and billing is split per model in one console.

How do the capabilities of GLM-5.2 and GLM-5.3 differ?

Their capability flags are identical. Every other capability is either supported by both or by neither; see the capability table above.

More comparisons

One API key for both GLM-5.2 and GLM-5.3

Free credits on sign-up, pay as you go, no monthly fee.

Get an API Key